Agha Waqar’s Water Car Scam Exposed

Agha Waqar’s Water Car Scam Exposed

Agha Waqar Ahmed who fooled millions of Pakistanis and showed that how easily we, as a nation can be hoaxed is finally
exposed. There was a huge coverage for the “water kit” of Agha Waqar in media. Agha Waqar claimed that any type of vehicle including cars, tractors and other automobiles could be run on purely water without any other mixture. Agha Waqar is believed to have received a diploma from a polytechnic in Khairpur and he demonstrated that his car could be run only on water. Millions of people including politicians believed in his claims and there started debates on funding him.

It is impossible to believe that a car can be run only on pure water without any mixture. It would have been much better for him if he had claimed improvement in performance or efficiency of the car by using his water kit with a combination of other fuels. There have been theoretical concepts of such water fueled cars. However, they are never practical. Further details of such water fuelled cars can be found on Wikipedia:

Agha Waqar who is not an engineer was completely unaware of some basic information about his so called water kit. Some of the very basic information that could have prevented him from making such ridiculous claims are:

The amount of energy produced by the explosive reaction of hydrogen with oxygen (to produce water as the product) can in no way be greater than the amount of energy that was needed in the first place to produce that hydrogen from water (by the breaking of the oxygen-hydrogen bonds).

A car battery and a small water kit simply could not produce the huge quantity of hydrogen needed (thousands of times greater) to produce sufficient hydrogen to run a car. Even if we believe that his kit was producing energy, his kit could not run a car even for a single minute.

The claim that the car engine will continue to charge the battery continuously was also nonsensical as the diminished amount of energy available due to inefficiencies in electrolysis and combustion will not be able to keep the car engine running.

Dr. Atta ur Rehman, President of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, (the highest level national body of eminent scientists)  was the only highly reputed scientists who knew instantly that it was a scam. According to him the car was obviously running but the water kit could not be the source of its power. He said that it was immediately apparent to me that there must be a hidden source of fuel going into the engine. The real source of power was a concealed pipeline of some other existing sources of fuels used for automobiles. Dr. Atta ur Rehman was surprised that the national press had blown up this discovery without bothering to having the vehicle first examined independently by technical experts.

After a meeting in the presidency, Dr. Atta ur Rehman was called by an engineering university to thoroughly inspect and examine the car. However, Agha Waqar did not turn up for the fixed appointment and the fraud was exposed.

Such fraudulent claims about water fuelled cars have also been made in the past with the first huge hoax by Stanley Myer in 1996. The Ohio court found him guilty of “gross and egregious fraud”.

In 2002, a company Genesis World Energy collected some $2.5 million from investors on claiming the invention of water fuelled cars. The owner of the company was later sentenced to 5 years in prison by a New Jersey court and fined $400,000. In 2008 a Sri Lankan charlatan Thushara Priyamal Edirising demonstrated similar systems to the Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ratnasiri Wickramanayaka. Thushara was later arrested for fraud. Further details of such water fuelled cars and related frauds can be found on Wikipedia:

The Agha Waqar’s discovery was discussed 3 times in the cabinet and it is believed that some powerful people were part of this scam with a possible aims of financial fraud.

The above articles is a summary of many opinions and interviews of scientists and researchers like Dr. Sammar Mubarak, Dr. Ata ur Rehman etc.


  1. personal finance blogs 2014 October 16, 2014 at 7:31 am - Reply

    What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively helpful and it has aided me out loads.
    I’m hoping to give a contribution & help other users like its helped me.
    Good job.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. ArtistDigital October 31, 2012 at 7:26 pm - Reply

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

  3. Akhtar September 11, 2012 at 4:55 am - Reply

    Dear all,

    Everything is possible in this world and science can and will bring more amazing inventions. However, the objection of most of the scholars is on the fact that detailed evidences and tests were not being carried out before accepting or rejecting the claimed inventions. There is a proper set of procedures and methods that need to be carried out instead of blindly accepting such a big claim. It is more the fault of media and the scholars who promoted and accepted the claims of the inventors without carrying out enough tests and procedures to verify/approve it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

  4. Abdul Hamid September 10, 2012 at 9:44 pm - Reply

    We can see many many Hoodboys and Ata Rehmans in past history too, who ridiculed great Inventors. Read Proof below: A MUST READING FOR ALL PEOPLE:

    Suppression of new ideas & innovation:

    It is not happening just with Agha, but in past also were many Hoodbhoys and Ata-Rehmans who opposed great inventions with full force. Please forward this message to ur colleagues if u liked it. Spread this massage throughout Pakistan in order to expose Hoodbhoys, Ata Rehmans and their pets. Thanks.

    Human history is riddled with examples of innovations and research that had been suppressed and derogated by the leading science community and the accepted scientific conventions of the time. Throughout human history, many innovators became the victims of the insults of the skeptical scientific, governmental and corporate power elites.

    German Professor George Ohm’s famous Ohm’s Law in initial publication was met with ridicule and dismissal and it was called “a tissue of naked fantasy.” In fact he was so much teased by Hoodbhoys and Ata-Rehmans of those days, that he resigned from professorship. Ten years later, scientists recognized its great importance. [Note: It is taught in Universities & is base of Electricity]

    NOW LISTEN ABOUT INVENTION OF AIRPLANE: During 1903 to 1908, Wrights Brother’s claims about their airplane invention were not believed. Most American scientists discredited the Wrights and proclaimed that their mechanism was a hoax. [Note: As is being said now by many Hoodbhoys & many Ata Rehmans about Agha Waqar].
    Another idiot Jahil Professor said “Airplanes are interesting toys, but of no military value.” – Said by Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy, Ecole Superieure de Guerre. [Note: All military powers has War planes i.e our Thunder].

    When Thomas Edison became successful with a light bulb filament he invited members of the scientific community to observe his demonstration. Although many from the general public went to witness the lamp, the noted scientists refused to attend. Sir William Siemens, England’s most distinguished engineer said “Such startling announcements as these should be deprecated as being unworthy of science and mischievous to its true progress.” Professor Du Moncel said “The Sorcerer of Menlo Park appears not to be acquainted with the subtleties of the electrical sciences. Mr. Edison takes us backwards.”

    “Mr. Bell, after careful consideration of your invention, while it is a very interesting novelty, we have come to the conclusion that it has no commercial possibilities.” — J. P. Morgan’s comments on behalf of the officials and engineers of Western Union after a demonstration of the newly invented telephone.

    “This ‘telephone’ has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us.” –Western Union internal memo, 1876. [Note: Now every house/person has telephone]

    When Nobel Laureate Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar presented his ideas at the Royal Astronomical Society in January 1935, most famous astronomer at that time, Arthur Eddington, ridiculed his ideas. It took decades before the Chandrasekhar Limit was accepted by all astrophysicists and eventually his idea became the foundation for the theory of black holes. Forty years later, Chandrasekhar was awarded the 1983 Nobel Prize in physics.

    Galileo’s ideas about the universe were first dismissed as being impossible. The priests and aristocrats feared the worldview that his ideas were beginning to force upon people. Galileo was placed under house arrest.

    The inventors of the turbine ship engine, the electric ships telegraph, and the steel ship hull were initially met with disbelief and derision for their work.

    “Louis Pasteur’s theory of germs is ridiculous fiction.” – Said by Pierre Pachet, Professor of Physiology, 1872..

    Nobel Laureate Hans Krebs’ discovery of the metabolic cycle that would eventually bear his name was rejected from the journal Nature.

    Nobel prize-winning biochemist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi never got funded for his work on the relevance of quantum physics to living organisms.

    When Nobel laureate Hans Alfven came up with the idea of parallel electric fields he was ridiculed for his work. [Note: It is taught in Universities]

    When Nobel laureate Svante Arrhenius proposed his idea that electrolytes are full of charged atoms, it was considered a crazy notion. [Note: It is taught in Universities]

    Luigi Galvani’s experiments were ridiculed because they countered established views. He was called the “frogs’ dance instructor.” His innovative experiments eventually became the basis for the biological study of neurophysiology. [Note: It is taught in Universities]

    When Scanning-tunneling microscope was invented in 1982, it was met by hostility and ridicule from the specialists in the microscopy field. In 1986, the inventors won the Nobel Prize.

    Stanford Ovshinsky’s invention of glasslike semiconductors was attacked by physicists and ignored for more than a decade [10 years]. Finally he got funding from the Japanese for his work. Consequently, the new science of amorphous semiconductor physics was born. [Note: It is taught in Universities]

    When Sherwood Rowland, Mario Molina and Paul Crutzen first warned that chemicals called cholorofluorocarbons or CFCs, were destroying the ozone layer they were ridiculed for their work. In 1995, Rowland, Molina and Crutzen, won a Nobel Prize for this discovery.

    When Warren and his team introduced a new facet to MRI theory, his colleagues at Princeton University told him that his insane ideas were endangering his career. They held a mean-spirited bogus presentation mocking his work. After seven years, Warren was vindicated. His discoveries are leading to the development of new MRI techniques. [Note: Now many benefit from this great invention]

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

  5. Mahmood Ahmed Shaikh September 4, 2012 at 5:36 pm - Reply

    The Calorific Value of HHO is about 3 times higher than CNG and there is one Chinese manufacturer who is manufacturing HHO generators gives HHO gas about 28 Meter Cube per Hour at 15 PSI and that is all just at an expense of 25 KW of 3 Phase Electrical Energy the Cost of the Chinese HHO Generator is hardly 400000/- PKR

    Cost of 1 mmBTU/Hr. of Methane in an Industrial Tariff Set by OGRA is around 495/-PKR or 495 X 13 = around 6500/- PKR Produces 1 MW or 1000 KW for one Hour. Or 6.5 PKR per Unit Cost

    As we Knew that 13 mm BTU/Hr. of Methane or CNG OR 370 Meter Cube per Hour at 7 PSI of Methane or CNG needed to produce 1 Mega Watt or 1000 KW of Electricity for an Hour from a Gas Engine Based Generator used in Captive power generation of most industrial units.

    For Just 25 KW the Chinese HHO Generator will at least cut down our Gas Consumption Bill from 13 mm BTU/Hr. to 10 mm BTU/Hr. very much conservatively then if we just Employ 4 such HHO Generators paralleling each other then, 25KW X 4 = 100 KW this means roughly 10% of energy will be compromised from 1000KW produced by the Gas Engine whereas the combined output of 4 HHO Generators gives more than 100 Meter Cube per Hour at 15 PSI of HHO Gas Plus 3 times Calorific Value by this way we can at least be able to run Gas engines 80 % to 90 % on HHO Gas & thus we will be able to save energy consumption of methane (Natural Gas) along with 900KW of Electricity in hand we can go further than that as well if Needed which eventually gives us free energy by initially putting some Natural Gas & then switching it to independent sources of HHO produced by itself.

    The Thumb Rule is that 10% to 15% Energy of Engine will be dedicated for electrolysis’s but average Automobile utilizes only 2% to 5% energy of engine energy to be converted into electrical energy this is the reason that it becomes difficult/ impossible to run engine 100% on self-powered bases, But if some alters the Engine Battery Charging Alternator(Generator) to produce 15% energy in electrical form the scenario changes significantly in favor of 100% water powered car so in this prospective it is Feasible in the case of Gas engine based Generator which can easily powered itself (100% self-powered) by just compromising 15% of generator power to run the engine through water for electricity generation.

    If we can just open our mind a bit more the impossible seems possible.

    But the Profit Motive of the Oil Companies & Government Revenue Collection Departments will never Ever Let it Happen they will always Prove it wrong so keep it up Buddy all of you are on the right side of proving it up wrong Oppose this Idea & you will be benefited in an ample way besides from where the hell the government will going to collects revenue it will cause some new & never before seen unprecedented problems people will get energy freedom this will be very wrong from governmental prospective.

    Mahmmod Ahmed Shaikh
    Cell# 0301 2322535

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  6. Asim Sohail August 14, 2012 at 11:43 am - Reply

    If something is against the universal energy Law, it’s a scam. No need to prove it physically as a scam. Most of the time such kind of inventors are unable to apprehend the energy balance of their device and mistakenly announce such claims.

    It’s an irony that despite some non technical person have clear concept of basics just due to fundamental knowledge of science but unfortunately some of technical persons don’t have it despite of their relevant professional education.

    Perhaps our education system is producing more RATTA machines & less conceptual professionals.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2

  7. Akhtar August 13, 2012 at 9:04 pm - Reply

    Its not a matter of whether it is true or not. The thing is if some one claims that he/she has invented something soooo big and which is against many of the existing laws/principles of science and physcis then it shud first b thoroughly investigated before publicising it soooo intensively. If that invention had worked, the whole world’s media wud have visited Pakistan for coverage.

    As mentioned in the article, its not the first time that people have made such claims. They have been making it since long ago.

    Yes thats true that Science can do anything. However, at the moment running a car with 100% pure water as a fuel is a SCIENCE FICTION.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2

  8. fiaz Awan August 13, 2012 at 6:58 pm - Reply

    Amazing how our nation including our so called scientists like Dr Qadeer and Smar Mubark, can be fooled very easily by a simple man. I claim that our nation is only nation on the Earth so easily can be fooled. I am still laughing the mentality of our Journalists Politicians, Ministers our president and above all our so called scientists who could not understand very very basic science. An ignoarnt nation due to Media.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  9. N A Janjua August 12, 2012 at 7:59 pm - Reply

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

  10. Abdullah Warsi P.E August 11, 2012 at 11:05 pm - Reply

    Any wise person can understand at the spot that it is despicable crime to declare Agha Waqar a fraud with out finding physically any fraud in car that he has already demonstrated in front of top journalists politicians and many Ph.D’s. Some theoretical Ph.D’s has launched hate campaign against the greatest inventor of mankind history Agha Waqar. All objections of these some IRRESPONSIBLE Ph.D’s do not carry any weight and sense. They WRONGLY claim, this invention violates laws of science; in fact it does not. The reason of their totally absurd claims is their jealousy against inventor & their inability to understand that new invention. Sometime they say, Agha is not engineer, so he cannot invent. But Edison the biggest inventor of history was too neither Ph.D nor even B.Engg. Ata Rehman & Hoodbhoy are driving in wrong direction on one way road. Their all hue & cry is, that car cannot be run on electrolysis with battery but they do not know that method of Agha is ABSOLUTELY not conventional Electrolysis. When they will know his method, they will not sleep many nights

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 6

  11. Abdullah Warsi P.E August 11, 2012 at 11:04 pm - Reply

    Your objection on this invention and your slandering campaign against this invention is ONLY AND ONLY based on your stubbornness, ignorance and jealousy. I can prove it as follow that what you have said is nothing but a piece of crap.

    1- You said that Agha is running car w/o external source. This is ur lie. Water has Hydrogen gas and Petrol has same gas too. In petrol car, battery runs fuel pump and in Agha’s car the current that is used for fuel pump is used to crack water into gases. So ur slander that it is perpetual machine is false and absurd. His new method is new invention and ABSOLUTELY NOT ELECTROLYSIS. U cannot activate electrolysis in distilled water.

    2- You said Agha has no Engineering Degree so he cannot be inventor. This your argument is EXTREMELY shameful because It is absolutely not necessary to have Ph.D or B.E Engg in order to invent. The biggest inventor of history Thomas Edison was neither a Ph.D nor even B.E Engg. This is fact that most of great inventors were not well versed in theory of sciences. They were just Technicians/Technologists like Agha.

    3- In your TV Shows and in ur articles you have frequently declared Agha a Fraud even without finding any physical fraud in his car that he has demonstrated already in front of many people. It is your total moral bankruptcy that you are mongering slanders of fraud even w/o Proof against that humble inventor.

    4- At the end of your article, you have said that GOV should give exemplary punishment to Agha. This is again your extremely preposterous claim as you are suggesting punishment against the greatest inventor of mankind history against whom you have no any proof of fraud.

    5- Truth is this, that Agha is not well versed in theory but yet have brought mother of all inventions. You and your old books have no ability yet to understand this invention. This is ABSOLUTELY NOT ELECTROLYSIS but a new technique. A liter water has energy equal to millions of KW too if u understand what I mean-fusion. You claim that you are Ph.D; yet you do not understand, that in distilled water, electrolysis cannot be activated. Your Ph.D must be investigated if it is not bogus. Because Agha is not well versed in theory, this is why he wrongly introduced his method as electrolysis. IT IS ABSOLUTELY NOT ELECTROLYSIS because battery cannot run car through electrolysis.

    6- The biggest proof of TRUTH is practical demonstration of invention in front of people which is eye witness through observation. That what Agha has already done. If you are unable to understand that invention, that does not mean it is fraud but it means, you have yet no ability to understand that invention & so you must educate yourself and updated your old man-made laws and theories as per new invention. In Agha’s system, his invention provides trigger for reaction, then that reaction is almost self-Sustaining. To change it from “Almost Self-Sustaining” to “SUSTAINING”, It need periodical push from car battery. But that push is in milliamps and so small that it is less than the current that car radio uses. Ata Rehman, I will not yet disclose secrets of this invention though I know it fully. I just give u hint and if your brain is still young, that will pick it. In his method Agha’s team provides trigger to start reaction & amp; after, that reaction can be sustained with very very little current from battery. Consider example of Kerosene lamp. You start/lit it once by a little fire; then that works itself. Only you have to add kerosene periodically to continue it. Instead of kerosene of this example in Agha’s Kit is needed very little current in milli-amps and more distilled water periodically so that it continues.

    7- You also claimed that what Agha has done is already been done by many in past. Here you have told again 100% lie. In past people has blended gas with petrol to reduce cost of Petrol but no one ever succeeded to replace petrol 100% by water. Agha is the first person who has done so and his invention is clear a TRUTH as is Sun on sky and and u will see it.

    Mr. Ata Rehman

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 7

Leave A Response »